Administrative Proportionality in Environmental Infractions in the Ecuadorian Legal System

Authors

Keywords:

Administrative law, environmental law, sanctioning administrative procedure, infraction, proportionality

Abstract

The sanctioning administrative procedure allows the public administration to exercise its public authority of control and sanction in response to conduct or omissions classified as administrative infractions, thereby establishing the principles of typicity and legality. From the perspective of environmental law, the Organic Environmental Code has incorporated various environmental infractions, which are classified according to their impact as minor, serious, or very serious. Each category entails a sanction as a legal consequence of non-compliance. Currently, in cases involving an economic sanction, a mathematical calculation must be carried
out to determine the fine to be imposed by the competent authority, based on the gross income generated by the alleged offender in the previous year. The purpose of this study is to analyze, from both a legal and practical perspective, how the provisions of the current regulations operate and how they affect the principle of proportionality recognized in administrative law, with the aim of proposing legislative alternatives to address the identified legal issue.

Keywords: Administrative law, environmental law, sanctioning administrative procedure, infraction, proportionality

Author Biography

César Andrés Vélez Andrade, Universidad Casa Grande

César Andrés Vélez Andradecvelez@casagrande.edu.ec

References

Cabanellas, Guillermo. Diccionario jurídico elemental. Buenos Aires: Heliasta, 2014.

Castro, Lucía. “La proporcionalidad como principio limitador en la determinación e imposición de las penas”. 2016. http://perso.unifr.ch/derechopenal/assets/files/articulos/a_20160408_03.pdf.

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. Sentencia No. 001-10-PJO-CC. 21 de diciembre de 2010.

Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. Sentencia No. 2137-21-EP/21. 29 de septiembre de 2021. https://esacc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/storage/api/v1/10_DWL_FL/e2NhcnBldGE6J3RyYW1pdGUnLCB1dWlkOic1NDAzMjFkOC00Y2MwLTQwMWQtOGM5Ni01MTU2YWY2ZmVjZWEucGRmJ30=

Ecuador. Código Orgánico Administrativo. Registro Oficial Suplemento 31, 7 de julio de 2017.

Ecuador. Código Orgánico del Ambiente. Registro Oficial Suplemento 983, 12 de abril de 2017.

Ecuador. Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial Suplemento 449, 20 de octubre de 2008.

Ecuador. Reglamento al Código Orgánico del Ambiente. Registro Oficial Suplemento 507, 12 de junio de 2019.

Fernández Nieto, J. El principio de proporcionalidad y derechos fundamentales: una visión desde el sistema europeo. Madrid: Dykinson, 2009.

García de Enterría, Eduardo, y Tomás-Ramón Fernández. Curso de Derecho Administrativo. Bogotá: Temis, 2008.

Gómez, Carlos. Dogmática del Derecho Disciplinario. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2019.

Gordillo, Agustín. Fundación de Derecho Administrativo. 1 de julio de 2024. https://www.gordillo.com/pdf_tomo11/secc5/despues6.pdf.

Jorge Corviello, Pedro. “El principio de proporcionalidad en el procedimiento administrativo”. Prudentia Iuris: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina, n.º 71 (2011).

Moreta, Andrés. Procedimiento Administrativo Sancionador en el COA. Quito: Ediciones Continente, 2019.

Petit, Jacques. “La sanción administrativa”. Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo, n.º 22 (2019): 315-350. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5038/503860786014/html/.

Santamaría Pastor, Juan Alfonso. Principios del Derecho Administrativo. Buenos Aires: Astrea, 1978.

Valdivia, José Miguel. Manual de Derecho Administrativo. Madrid: Tirant lo Blanch, 2018.

Published

2025-05-22 — Updated on 2026-04-04

Versions

How to Cite

Vélez Andrade, César Andrés. (2025) 2026. “Administrative Proportionality in Environmental Infractions in the Ecuadorian Legal System”. UDA Law Review 6 (1):59-69. https://periodico.uazuay.edu.ec/index.php/udalawreview/article/view/926.